<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.  But in practice&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commontragedies.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/in-theory-there-is-no-difference-between-theory-and-practice-but-in-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commontragedies.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/in-theory-there-is-no-difference-between-theory-and-practice-but-in-practice/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Environmental Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 01:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caps, taxes and The Man &#171; The visible hand in economics</title>
		<link>http://commontragedies.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/in-theory-there-is-no-difference-between-theory-and-practice-but-in-practice/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caps, taxes and The Man &#171; The visible hand in economics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commontragedies.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/in-theory-there-is-no-difference-between-theory-and-practice-but-in-practice/#comment-129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has a fairly detailed comparison of cap-and-trade and carbon tax systems in their latest issue. A couple of commentators have interpreted the article as supporting their preference for a cap-and-trade [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a fairly detailed comparison of cap-and-trade and carbon tax systems in their latest issue. A couple of commentators have interpreted the article as supporting their preference for a cap-and-trade [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
